Degenerate-singular elliptic operators: sharp coercivity, weighted well-posedness, and Green’s function methods for tumor-diffusion models

Authors

  • D.B. Eshmamatova V.I.Romanovskiy Institute of Mathematics, AS RUz Author
  • N.K. Ochilova Tashkent State Transport University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71310/pcam.4_74.2026.09

Keywords:

degenerate elliptic equation, weighted Sobolev space, Muckenhoupt weight, Hardy inequality, Green’s function, Carleman–Vekua regularization

Abstract

We study a family of degenerate-singular second- and third-order elliptic boundary value problems modeling anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous tumor tissue, all built on one differential operator with a power-law degeneracy in one spatial direction and a singular lower-order term in the other. First, in an anisotropically weighted Sobolev space matched to the degenerate direction, we prove existence and uniqueness of a weak solution of the nonlinear problem for small degeneracy exponents under explicit smallness conditions on the singular coefficient and on the growth of the monotone reaction term, together with interior regularity and a conditional global weighted estimate for larger exponents. Second, in an auxiliary weighted energy space adapted to the degenerate principal part, we establish a coercivity threshold for the singular coefficient that is valid for both signs of the coefficient and for every degeneracy exponent, and prove that its negative side is sharp by means of an explicit minimizing sequence for the underlying Hardy inequality; well-posedness, stability estimates, and interior regularity then follow. Third, for the associated third-order equation we formulate Dirichlet- and Neumanntype boundary value problems, prove a new extremum principle establishing uniqueness, and reduce existence, via the classical Carleman–Vekua regularization, to a Fredholm equation of the second kind built from an explicit Green’s function. A finite-difference scheme, verified against a manufactured exact solution with second-order convergence, confirms the behaviour of solutions near the degenerate boundary. The biomedical interpretation — diffusion of oxygen, a drug, or a signalling molecule through necrotic, poorly vascularized tumor tissue — is discussed throughout.

References

Chaplain M. A. J., Preziosi L. 2025. Mathematical oncology. Cham: Springer.

Salakhitdinov M. S., Mirsaburov M. 2005. Nelokal’nye zadachi dlya uravneniy smeshannogo tipa s singulyarnymi koeffitsientami [Nonlocal problems for mixed-type equations with singular coefficients]. Tashkent: Universitet. (In Russian)

Mirsaburov M. 2012. A boundary value problem for a class of mixed-type equations with the Bitsadze–Samarskii condition on degeneration lines. Uzbek Mathematical Journal. No. 2: 48–57.

Mirsaburov M., Ruziev M. Kh. 2014. A problem with conditions on both characteristics and on a degeneration line for a class of hyperbolic–parabolic equations. Differential Equations. 50: 1347–1359.

Bitsadze A. V., Salakhitdinov M. S. 1961. On the theory of equations of mixed-composite type. Siberian Mathematical Journal. 2(1): 7–19.

Djuraev T. D. 1979. Kraevye zadachi dlya uravneniy smeshannogo i smeshanno-sostavnogo tipov [Boundary value problems for equations of mixed and mixed-composite types]. Tashkent: Fan. (In Russian)

Li F., Yao Z. A., Yu R. 2024. A general degenerate reaction-diffusion model for acidmediated tumor invasion. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik. 75(3): Art. 75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-024-02220-z.

Deiva Mani V. N., Marshal Anthoni S., Nyamoradi N. 2021. Solvability of solid tumor invasion model. Results in Mathematics. 76(1): Art. 39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-021-01346-0.

Colli P., Gilardi G., Signori A., Sprekels J. 2023. Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman model for tumor growth with possibly singular potentials. Nonlinearity. 36(8): 4470–4500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ace2a7.

Frigeri S., Lam K. F., Signori A. 2022. Strong well-posedness and inverse identification problem of a non-local phase field tumour model with degenerate mobilities. European Journal of Applied Mathematics. 33(2): 267–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792521000012.

Muckenhoupt B. 1972. Weighted norm inequalities for the Hardy maximal function. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 165: 207–226.

Ladyzhenskaya O. A., Ural’tseva N. N. 1968. Linear and quasilinear elliptic equations. New York, London: Academic Press.

Kufner A. 1980. Weighted Sobolev spaces. Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik, Vol. 31. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.

Maz’ya V. 2011. Sobolev spaces with applications to elliptic partial differential equations. Heidelberg: Springer.

Cruz-Uribe D., Martell J. M., Pérez C. 2011. Weights, extrapolation and the theory of Rubio de Francia. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Opic B., Kufner A. 1990. Hardy-type inequalities. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, Vol. 219. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical.

Ruzhansky M., Suragan D. 2019. Hardy inequalities. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Cham: Springer.

Sadhukhan S., Basu S. K. 2020. Avascular tumour growth models based on anomalous diffusion. Journal of Biological Physics. 46(1): 67–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-020-09541-w.

Ochilova N. K. 2026. Mixed-composite type equations as a model of anomalous diffusion in tumor tissues. Problems of Computational and Applied Mathematics. No. 2(72): 16–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.71310/pcam.2_72.2026.02.

Zeidler E. 1990. Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications. II/B: Nonlinear monotone operators. New York: Springer.

Lions J.-L. 1969. Quelques méthodes de résolution des problèmes aux limites non linéaires. Paris: Dunod.

Byrne H. M., Chaplain M. A. J. 1996. Modelling the role of cell–cell adhesion in the growth and development of carcinomas. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 24(12): 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(96)00174-4.

Gilbarg D., Trudinger N. S. 2001. Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Muskhelishvili N. I. 1968. Singulyarnye integral’nye uravneniya [Singular integral equations]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian)

Atlas A., Bendahmane M., Karami F., Tagoudjeu J., Zagour M. 2025. Integrating stochastic chemotaxis–haptotaxis mechanisms in cancer invasion: a multiscale derivation and computational perspective. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 22(10): 2641–2671. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2025097.

Wang J., Mo Y. 2026. Effects of diffusion on dynamics of a competition system between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cells. Acta Mathematica Scientia. 46(1): 459–504.

Kumar P., Surulescu C., Zhigun A. 2022. Multiphase modelling of glioma pseudopalisading under acidosis. Mathematics in Engineering. 4(6): 1–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/mine.2022049.

Alabdrabalnabi A. S., Ali I. 2024. Stability analysis and simulations of tumor growth model based on system of reaction-diffusion equation in two-dimensions. AIMS Mathematics. 9(5): 11560–11579. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024567.

Fornoni M. 2024. Maximal regularity and optimal control for a nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard tumour growth model. Journal of Differential Equations. 410: 382–448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2024.07.036.

Perthame B., Villa C. 2026. Existence, regularity and stability in a strongly degenerate nonlinear diffusion and haptotaxis model of cancer invasion. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis. 58(3): 2948–2964. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/24M1722079.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15

Issue

Section

Статьи