Pfaffian Structure and Spectral Dynamics of a Discrete Lotka–Volterra Operator: A Framework for Geological Evidence Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71310/pcam.5_76.2026.07Keywords:
discrete Lotka–Volterra operator, Pfaffian invariant, fixed-point card, interior fixed point, local spectrum, gold prospectivity assessmentAbstract
This paper investigates the connection between Pfaffian invariants, fixed-point geometry, and local spectral dynamics of a discrete Lotka–Volterra operator on the fourdimensional simplex. For an interaction tournament containing four cyclic triples, the unique interior fixed points of the corresponding invariant two-dimensional faces form the vertices of a fixed-point card. Using an established orientation criterion and a specified sign convention, the cyclic configuration of this card is characterized by fourth-order principal Pfaffian invariants. Under positivity of the full Pfaffian vector, an interior fixed point is constructed explicitly through normalized Pfaffian ratios. The characteristic polynomial of the Jacobian at this point is expressed in terms of the interaction coefficients and the same invariants. The simplex tangent space is proved to be invariant under the Jacobian, and the restricted spectrum consists of two complex conjugate pairs with moduli greater than one, establishing locally repelling dynamics with oscillatory components. These results place fixed-point geometry and local spectral behavior within a common algebraic framework, providing explicit formulas suitable for computational analysis. A mathematical interpretation for integrating five groups of geological evidence is also proposed. Distances to fixed-point configurations and interaction-response measures are introduced as descriptors of evidence composition and interaction. Their potential use in gold prospectivity assessment requires calibration against exploration observations and independent empirical validation.
References
Lyubich Yu. I. 1992. Mathematical Structures in Population Genetics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Biomathematics, Vol. 22.
Ganikhodzhaev R. N. 1993. Quadratic stochastic operators, Lyapunov functions, and tournaments. Russian Academy of Sciences. Sbornik Mathematics. 76(2): 489–506. doi: https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1993v076n02ABEH003423.
Eshmamatova D. B. 2022. Compositions of Lotka–Volterra mappings operating in a twodimensional simplex, relation to viral diseases and their numerical analysis. Problems of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 3(41): 79–92.
Moon J. W. 1968. Topics on Tournaments. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Tadzhieva M. A., Eshmamatova D. B., Ganikhodzhaev R. N. 2024. Volterra-type quadratic stochastic operators with a homogeneous tournament. Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 278(3): 546–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-024-06937-0.
Ganikhodzhaev R. N., Kurganov K. A., Tadzhieva M. A., Khaidarov F. Kh. 2024. Dynamics of quadratic Volterra-type stochastic operators corresponding to strange tournaments. Vladikavkaz Mathematical Journal. 26(1): 85–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.46698/n9080-6847-9986-u.
Eshmamatova D. B., Tadzhieva M. A. 2024. Cards of fixed points of some Lotka–Volterra operators. e-Journal of Analysis and Applied Mathematics. 2024: 71–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.62780/ejaam/2024-006.
Solijanova K. 2026. Spectral Properties and Fixed Point Structure of a Lotka–Volterra Operator on the Four-Dimensional Simplex. Journal of Mathematical Sciences. Online first. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-026-08434-y.
Solijanova K. 2026. Degenerate Fixed-Point Configurations of a Discrete Lotka–Volterra Operator. Journal of Mathematical Sciences. Online first. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-026-08610-0.
Geiger P. M., Knebel J., Frey E. 2018. Topologically robust zero-sum games and Pfaffian orientation: How network topology determines the long-time dynamics of the antisymmetric Lotka–Volterra equation. Physical Review E. 98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.062316.
Eshmamatova D. B. 2022. Discrete models of viral diseases with reinfection transmitted by the airborne droplet route. Problems of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 4(42): 36–54.
Horn R. A., Johnson C. R. 2013. Matrix Analysis. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Yusupov F. A. 2024. Modeling the dynamics of computer virus spread using compositions of Lotka–Volterra mappings. Problems of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 3(57): 122–139.
Eshmamatova D. B., Tadzhieva M. A., Ganikhodzhaev R. N. 2022. Criteria for internal fixed points existence of discrete dynamic Lotka–Volterra systems with homogeneous tournaments. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics. 30(6): 702–716. doi: https://doi.org/10.18500/0869-6632-003012.
Carranza E. J. M. 2008. Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Handbook of Exploration and Environmental Geochemistry, Vol. 11.
Zuo R., Carranza E. J. M. 2023. Machine learning-based mapping for mineral exploration. Mathematical Geosciences. 55: 891–895. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-023-10097-3.
Austin J. R., Gazley M., Birchall R. [et al.] 2024. Integration by design: driving mineral system knowledge using multi-modal, collocated, scale-consistent characterisation. Earth System Science Data. 16: 5027–5067. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5027-2024.
Shirmard H., Farahbakhsh E., Müller R. D., Chandra R. 2022. A review of machine learning in processing remote sensing data for mineral exploration. Remote Sensing of Environment. 268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112750.
Behera S., Panigrahi M. K. 2022. Gold prospectivity mapping and exploration targeting in Hutti-Maski schist belt, India: Synergistic application of Weights-of-Evidence (WOE), Fuzzy Logic (FL) and hybrid (WOE-FL) models. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2022.106963.
Zhang S. E., Lawley C. J. M., Bourdeau J. E., Nwaila G. T., Ghorbani Y. 2024. Workflowinduced uncertainty in data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping. Natural Resources Research. 33: 995–1023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10322-8.
Zuo R., Kreuzer O.P., Wang J., Xiong Y., Zhang Z., Wang Z. 2021. Uncertainties in GIS-Based Mineral Prospectivity Mapping: Key Types, Potential Impacts and Possible Solutions. Natural Resources Research. 30: 3059–3079. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09871-z.
Parsa M., Cumani R. 2025. Class label representativeness in machine learning-based mineral prospectivity mapping. Natural Resources Research. 34: 1901–1925. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-025-10468-z.
Ribeiro B. O. L., Barbuena D., de Melo G. H. C., Motta J. G., Marques E. D., Marinho M. S. 2024. How do non-deposit sites influence the performance of machine learning-based gold prospectivity mapping: A study case in the Pitangui Greenstone Belt, Brazil. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107543.
Lu M., Zhong L., He W. [et al.] 2026. Explainable Machine Learning in Mineral Prospectivity Mapping: A Critical Review of Methods, Geological Knowledge Embedding, Validation, and Future Directions. Minerals. 16(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/min16101003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 D.B. Eshmamatova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.