Monte Carlo Solution of the Nonlinear Kinetic Boltzmann Equation

Authors

  • A.S. Rasulov University of World Economy and Diplomacy Author
  • G.M. Raimova University of World Economy and Diplomacy Author
  • M.Y. Rakhmatov University of Digital Economy and Agrotechnologies Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71310/pcam.5_76.2026.01

Keywords:

Monte Carlo method, nonlinear Boltzmann equation, regularized collision kernel, branching Markov process, importance sampling, shock-wave structure

Abstract

We study a nonlinear integral equation of Boltzmann type for a nonnegative measure and discuss a Monte Carlo representation based on a branching Markov process. Under an explicit absolute-continuity assumption, the measure equation is written as an equation for a density. The collision model used in the derivation is a regularized, spatially localized kernel; the velocity transformation in the displayed collision law preserves the relative speed and kinetic energy of a pair and therefore represents elastic, isotropic scattering rather than inelastic collisions. We derive the time-sampling density associated with the constant collision rate and identify the normalization factor required when the collision integral is transformed to spherical coordinates with a normalized angular measure. We also describe the importance-sampling factors that enter the path weights. The shock-wave calculation is retained as a preliminary numerical illustration. The currently available figures and parameter list do not, by themselves, establish unbiasedness of the truncated estimator, finite variance, conservation of macroscopic moments, quantitative agreement with a reference solution, or computational superiority over an iterative method. Those properties require the convergence, conservation, and uncertainty checks specified in the text.

References

Bird G. A. 1994. Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 458 p.

Nanbu K. 1980. Direct simulation scheme derived from the Boltzmann equation. I. Monocomponent gases. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 49(5): 2042–2049. doi: https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.49.2042.

Wagner W. 1992. A convergence proof for Bird’s direct simulation Monte Carlo method for the Boltzmann equation. Journal of Statistical Physics. 66: 1011–1044. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055714.

Ohwada T. 1993. Structure of normal shock waves. Physics of Fluids A. 5: 217–223.

Alsmeyer H. 1976. Density profiles in argon and nitrogen shock waves measured by the absorption of an electron beam. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 74(3): 497–513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112076001912.

Mott-Smith H. M. 1951. The solution of the Boltzmann equation for a shock wave. Physical Review. 82: 885–892.

Sitnikov S. S., Tcheremissine F. G. 2024. Computation of a shock wave structure in a gas mixture based on the Boltzmann equation with accuracy control. Computer Research and Modeling. 16(5): 1107–1123. doi: https://doi.org/10.20537/2076-7633-2024-16-5-1107-1123.

Fei F., Hu Y., Jenny P. 2022. A unified stochastic particle method based on the Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook model for polyatomic gases and its combination with DSMC. Journal of Computational Physics. 471: Art. 111640. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111640.

Dцntgen M. 2024. Theory and simulation of shock waves freely propagating through monoatomic non-Boltzmann gas. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics. 38: 61–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-023-00683-w.

Luo L., Wu L. 2024. Multiscale simulation of rarefied gas dynamics via direct intermittent GSIS-DSMC coupling. Advances in Aerodynamics. 6: Article 22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-024-00188-y.

Kim S., Jun E. 2024. An evaluation of the hybrid Fokker–Planck-DSMC approach for high-speed rarefied gas flows. Computers & Fluids. 285: Article 106456. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106456.

Ermakov S. M., Nekrutkin V. V., Sipin A. S. 1989. Random processes for classical equations of mathematical physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 282 p.

Nekrutkin V. V. 1974. Direct and adjoint schemes of the Monte Carlo method for solving the nonlinear Boltzmann equation. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. 14(6): 39–45.

Ueno T. 1971. A class of Markov processes with non-linear, bounded generators. Proceedings of the Japan Academy. 47(6): 529–533.

Povzner A.Ya. 1962. Ob uravnenii Bol’tsmana v kineticheskoy teorii gazov [On the Boltzmann equation in the kinetic theory of gases]. Matematicheskii Sbornik. 58(100)(1): 65–86. (In Russian)

Caflisch R., Silantyev D., Yang Y. 2021. Adjoint DSMC for nonlinear Boltzmann equation constrained optimization. Journal of Computational Physics. 439: Art. 110404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110404.

Guan G., Matsushima K., Noguchi K., Yamada T. 2023. Topology optimization for rarefied gas flow problems using density method and adjoint IP-DSMC. Journal of Computational Physics. 474: Art. 111788. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111788.

Rasulov A. S., Mascagni M., Raimova G. M. 2006. Monte Carlo methods for solution of linear and nonlinear boundary value problems. Tashkent: UWED Publishers.

Tanaka H. 1973. On Markov process corresponding to Boltzmann’s equation of Maxwellian gas. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 330: 478–489.

Haviland J. K. 1969. Resheniye dvukh zadach o molekulyarnom techenii metodom Monte-Karlo [The solution of two molecular flow problems by the Monte Carlo method]. Vychislitel’nyye metody v dinamike razrezhennykh gazov [Computational methods in rarefied gas dynamics]. Moscow: Mir. 7–115. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2026-11-02

Issue

Section

Статьи