A Mass-Conserving Model of Pollutant Transport in the Atmosphere Over Complex Terrain

Authors

  • P.A. Nasrullaev Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence Development Research Institute Author
  • O.S. Juraboeva Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence Development Research Institute Author
  • G.B. Samanova Tashkent State Medical University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71310/pcam.4-1_75.2026.16

Keywords:

atmospheric boundary layer, pollutant dispersion, terrain-following coordinate, finite-volume method, mass conservation, Monin–Obukhov similarity, Copernicus DEM

Abstract

A mathematical model and a verified numerical method are developed for the transport of passive and settling pollutants in the atmospheric boundary layer over complex terrain. The advection–diffusion equation is written in the terrain-following coordinate ???? = (????−ℎ)/(????????????????−ℎ) in fully conservative (Jacobian-weighted) form. The contravariant vertical velocity is diagnosed from the discrete continuity equation, so that the kinematic condition at the terrain surface is satisfied exactly and no mass can cross the ground. The horizontal wind, prescribed from a single-point forecast or reanalysis through a logarithmic profile in the height above ground, is made mass-consistent by a column-flux normalisation under a rigid lid. Turbulent diffusivities follow Monin–Obukhov similarity with a parabolic decay towards the top of the layer, and the stability parameter is obtained from the hourly solar radiation and air temperature. The finite-volume discretization uses shared face fluxes, first-order upwinding, and an explicit step chosen from a local positivity bound. It conserves mass to round-off, preserves a uniform field exactly, and keeps concentrations non-negative without clipping. Verification includes an analytical point-source solution (relative ????2 error 1.1%, ???? = 0.9999, ????????????2 = 1 on the finest grid), grid and time-step refinement, and a closed global budget with residual below 2×10−12. It is also shown that the widely used simplification of a horizontal wind (???? = 0) in the ????-equation violates the kinematic surface condition: over a 200 m ridge it removes more than 60% of the emitted mass within 15 min and produces a spurious lee-side attenuation of two to three orders of magnitude. With the conservative formulation, a ridge changes near-ground concentrations by 2–51%, the largest effect occurring for an elevated source under stable stratification, whereas atmospheric stability changes them by more than an order of magnitude. The model is coupled with the Copernicus digital elevation model and ERA5 reanalysis data and applied to the city of Tashkent.

References

Seinfeld J. H., Pandis S. N. 2016. Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 1152 p.

Stull R. B. 1988. An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 666 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8.

Cimorelli A. J., Perry S. G., Venkatram A. [et al.] 2005. AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: general model formulation and boundary layer characterization. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 44(5): 682–693. doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2227.1.

Scire J. S., Strimaitis D. G., Yamartino R. J. 2000. A user’s guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model (version 5). Concord, MA: Earth Tech, Inc. 521 p.

Stohl A., Forster C., Frank A., Seibert P., Wotawa G. 2005. Technical note: the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 5: 2461–2474. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005.

Byun D., Schere K. L. 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Applied Mechanics Reviews. 59(2): 51–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2128636.

Snyder W. H., Thompson R. S., Eskridge R.E. [et al.] 1985. The structure of strongly stratified flow over hills: dividing-streamline concept. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 152: 249–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085000684.

Jackson P. S., Hunt J. C. R. 1975. Turbulent wind flow over a low hill. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 101(430): 929–955. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710143015.

Phillips N. A. 1957. A coordinate system having some special advantages for numerical forecasting. Journal of Meteorology. 14(2): 184–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1957)014<0184:ACSHSS>2.0.CO;2.

Gal-Chen T., Somerville R. C. J. 1975. On the use of a coordinate transformation for the solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 17(2): 209–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(75)90037-6.

Schär C., Leuenberger D., Fuhrer O., Lüthi D., Girard C. 2002. A new terrain-following vertical coordinate formulation for atmospheric prediction models. Monthly Weather Review. 130(10): 2459–2480. doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2459:ANTFVC>2.0.CO;2.

Monin A. S., Obukhov A. M. 1954. Osnovnye zakonomernosti turbulentnogo peremeshivaniya v prizemnom sloe atmosfery [Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere]. Trudy Geofizicheskogo instituta AN SSSR. 24(151): 163–187. (In Russian)

Businger J. A., Wyngaard J. C., Izumi Y., Bradley E. F. 1971. Flux-profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 28(2): 181–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0181:FPRITA>2.0.CO;2.

Dyer A. J. 1974. A review of flux-profile relationships. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 7(3): 363–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240838.

O’Brien J. J. 1970. A note on the vertical structure of the eddy exchange coefficient in the planetary boundary layer. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 27(8): 1213–1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<1213:ANOTVS>2.0.CO;2.

Holtslag A. A. M., van Ulden A.P. 1983. A simple scheme for daytime estimates of the surface fluxes from routine weather data. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology. 22(4): 517–529. doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<0517:ASSFDE>2.0.CO;2.

Hersbach H., Bell B., Berrisford P. [et al.] 2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 146(730): 1999–2049. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803.

European Space Agency 2021. Copernicus global digital elevation model (COP-DEM). Distributed by OpenTopography. doi: https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-c5d3d65.

Zippenfenig P. 2023. Open-Meteo.com Weather API. Computer software. Zenodo. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7970649.

Ravshanov N., Muradov F., Akhmedov D. 2020. Operator splitting method for numerical solving the atmospheric pollutant dispersion problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1441: Art. 012164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1441/1/012164.

Ravshanov N., Nazarov Sh. E., Boborakhimov B. 2024. Modeling the process of pollutant spread in the atmosphere with account for the capture of particles by vegetation elements. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics. 45(3): 1213–1226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080224600638.

Ravshanov N., Boborahimov B. I., Berdiyorov Sh. Sh. 2026. Numerical modeling of filtration and transport processes in a cylindrical porous filter using the finite volume method. Problems of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 1(71): 28–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.71310/pcam.1_71.2026.03.

Lam S. K., Pitrou A., Seibert S. 2015. Numba: a LLVM-based Python JIT compiler. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC. Art. 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2833157.2833162.

Chang J. C., Hanna S. R. 2004. Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics. 87(1–3): 167–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

Issue

Section

Статьи